When the UN decided to reform the Commission on Human Rights and create a new Human Rights Council, it added a requirement that every country go through a public review of its human rights record on all rights, and before a committee consisting of all members of the UN.
This so-called "Universal Periodic Review" (UPR) was seen by many UN diplomats as the procedure that would save the new Council and bring new country-specific scrutiny to every country.
As the Obama Administration was taking office in January 2009, the Congressional-Executive Commission on China held a roundtable briefing on the UPR and how non-governmental groups could be involved in the UPR of China. JBI Director Felice Gaer was one of the panelists who provided testimony.
Gaer emphasized that since China had participated in the review of nearly 50 other states at that time, asking numerous questions about their compliance with human rights issues, it was appropriate that the U.S. and other states participate in a thorough review of China. At the end of the process, countries are presented with recommendations, which they can either accept or reject.
As one prominent NGO, Human Rights in China noted, the PRC government rejected a large number of basic civil-political rights recommendations, including freedom of information, protection of lawyers and human rights defenders from attacks, freedom of religion (and movement) for Tibetans, Uihgurs, etc.